Repository logo
 
Publication

Assessing the effects of different land-use/land-cover input datasets on modelling and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services : Case study Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal)

dc.contributor.authorSieber, Ina M.
dc.contributor.authorHinsch, Malte
dc.contributor.authorVergílio, Marta H. S.
dc.contributor.authorGil, Artur José Freire
dc.contributor.authorBurkhard, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T12:29:15Z
dc.date.available2022-02-15T12:29:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.description.abstractModelling ecosystem services (ES) has become a new standard for the quantification and assessment of various ES. Multiple ES model applications are available that spatially estimate ES supply on the basis of land-use/land-cover (LULC) input data. This paper assesses how different input LULC datasets affect the modelling and mapping of ES supply for a case study on Terceira Island, the Azores (Portugal), namely: (1) the EU-wide CORINE LULC, (2) the Azores Region official LULC map (COS.A 2018) and (3) a remote sensing-based LULC and vegetation map of Terceira Island using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. The InVEST model suite was applied, modelling altogether six ES (Recreation/Visitation, Pollination, Carbon Storage, Nutrient Delivery Ratio, Sediment Delivery Ratio and Seasonal Water Yield). Model outcomes of the three LULC datasets were compared in terms of similarity, performance and applicability for the user. For some InVEST modules, such as Pollination and Recreation, the differences in the LULC datasets had limited influence on the model results. For InVEST modules, based on more complex calculations and processes, such as Nutrient Delivery Ratio, the output ES maps showed a skewed distribution of ES supply. Yet, model results showed significant differences for differences in all modules and all LULCs. Understanding how differences arise between the LULC input datasets and the respective effect on model results is imperative when computing model-based ES maps. The choice for selecting appropriate LULC data should depend on: 1) the research or policy/decision-making question guiding the modelling study, 2) the ecosystems to be mapped, but also on 3) the spatial resolution of the mapping and 4) data availability at the local level. Communication and transparency on model input data are needed, especially if ES maps are used for supporting land use planning and decision-making.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union, under the programme Pilot Project — Mapping and Assessing the State of Ecosystems and their Services in the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories: establishing links and pooling resources, MOVE Project (MOVE-Facilitating MAES to support regional policy in Overseas Europe: mobilizing stakeholders and pooling resources, grant agreement Nº 07.027735/2018/776517/SUB/ENV.D2, www.moveproject.eu).en
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSieber, I.M., Hinsch, M., Vergílio, M., Gil, A. & Burkhard, B. (2021). Assessing the effects of different land-use/land-cover input datasets on modelling and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services - Case study Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal). “One Ecosystem”, 6, e69119. DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.6.e69119en
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/oneeco.6.e69119pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn2367-8194
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/6196
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/11878
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherPensoft Publisherspt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/69119/pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectInVESTpt_PT
dc.subjectEcosystem Services Modellingen
dc.subjectIslandsen
dc.subjectGeospatial Dataen
dc.titleAssessing the effects of different land-use/land-cover input datasets on modelling and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services : Case study Terceira Island (Azores, Portugal)en
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceBulgariapt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage26pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleOne Ecosystempt_PT
oaire.citation.volume6pt_PT
person.familyNameFreire Gil
person.givenNameArtur José
person.identifierI-7520-2012
person.identifier.ciencia-id6E1A-0689-D573
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4450-8167
person.identifier.scopus-author-id37064609200
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication24d6aa34-c843-42df-b790-912f09560a80
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery24d6aa34-c843-42df-b790-912f09560a80

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
P1878_Gil_2021_OneEcosystem.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format